The Sin and the Shepherd
Friday, June 19th, 2009I was having a conversation with my wife concerning a topic from her recent class about whether or not a church should give a baby shower to an unwed teen who becomes pregnant.
If I, as her pastor, were to elect not to give her a baby shower, then I have a dilemma, because the teenage girl is not the only one who needs some correction. And I’m not talking about her parents or the person who helped her to conceive.
“…you shepherds, hear the word of the Lord: As surely as I live, declares the Sovereign Lord, because my flock lacks a shepherd and so has been plundered and has become food for all the wild animals, and because my shepherds did not search for my flock but cared for themselves rather than for my flock, therefore, O shepherds, hear the word of the Lord: This is what the Sovereign Lord says: I am against the shepherds and will hold them accountable for my flock. I will remove them from tending the flock so that the shepherds can no longer feed themselves. I will rescue my flock from their mouths, and it will no longer be food for them” (Ezekiel 34:7-10 NIV). This entire passage of Ezekiel 34 should be read by everyone who chooses to lead in the Church.
Proactive discipline is essential, and reactive forgiveness is mandatory.
You probably recall a guy named Lamech who thought a lot of himself. He was so egocentric that he said, “If Cain is avenged seven times, then Lamech seventy-seven times” (Genesis 4:24). Seventy-seven times is a figurative number that means “immeasurable.”
Jesus uses the opposite of punishment to make a point about giving immeasurable forgiveness to those who sin. “Then Peter came to Jesus and asked, ‘Lord, how many times shall I forgive my brother when he sins against me? Up to seven times?’ Jesus answered, ‘I tell you, not seven times, but seventy-seven times.”
Though the ungodly give immeasurable punishment, the godly give immeasurable forgiveness.
My conclusion would be: If the girl and her baby can’t celebrate the life of the child God has provided, and receive the needs of raising a child from her church body, then I, as her pastor, shouldn’t have the tools to preach and lead worship, because I have also failed, and she is no more a sinner than I.
She gave in to lust, and I gave in to lazy.
Fortunately, immeasurable forgiveness is also given to the undershepherd who has lost track of one of the Shepherd’s sheep. God watches as we both make our way back home, and He celebrates our return (Luke 15:20ff).
There will be those, like the older brother in the parable of the “Prodigal Son,” who think that the young girl should be punished and shamed. But the big brother in the story has forgotten that he is also a sinner, and has been no less lost than the one who went astray.
It is the first-century, Jewish expectation that the oldest brother serves as the undershepherd of his father’s family. When the younger children get out of hand, like the younger, selfish brother in the story, it is the older brother’s role to offer correction and guidance on the father’s behalf. In this story we notice that the older brother offers neither correction nor guidance, and therefore has neglected his role and given opportunity for the younger son to stray.
We must not make the mistake of assuming the role of the pastor as that of the father in the story. The father, of course, represents God who has provided all. It is the oldest son who represents the neglectful undershepherd of his father’s sheep.
“Lord, forgive me for the sin of allowing these little ones under my care to be attacked by the beasts of immorality.”
In His dust,
Johnny
![]()
© 2009 Jonathan P. Gainey and Flock’s Diner.
All Rights Reserved
